You’re sitting with your critique partners, either in mind or in body, and you’re plotting. (And for you pantsters out there, this is how it goes, so listen up!) You say, “I have an idea for a story where the heroine completely misunderstands everything about the hero and jumps to all sorts of belittling conclusions about him and in the end realizes she totally misjudged him and he’s actually a super-nice person and she’s the beeyotch from Hell who just ruined all possible chances of an HEA with said hero only that can’t be completely true because it’s a romance novel. Now what?”
And your cps say, “Ok, that sounds like a Pride & Prejudice-esque plot, so first we have to build credibility with the heroine so the reader will believe her. And how are you going to keep the reader from knowing the heroine is wrong until the end?”
Now that pretty much traps you into a single POV novel, but you’re ok with it. After all, your heroine knows nothing about the hero until she figures out what she basically made up in her head was wrong, right? Sounds fun. So you start with the obvious plot points and begin your brainstorming.
If my hero did this, my heroine could reasonably think this.
If my heroine did this, my hero could logically respond with this.
If my heroine’s friend whispered this, my heroine would have no choice but to agree and do this.
And on and on until BAM! Unrecoverable play on the heroine’s part. The reader is sent back in time to flip through all the clues that were there but that the heroine missed out on because she was so sure of her path, and now everyone, including the heroine, is wondering how on earth the story can end happily.
I think of this as one form of Disaster Plotting, and Maven Erica was the first person to ever bring it to my attention as a technique. It’s what many chick lits and chick flicks rely on and I, personally, gobble it up. (And I CAN’T WAIT for Forgetting Sarah Marshall this weekend!)
But it turns out, Disaster Plotting can actually happen TO YOU. In Real Life.
And maybe that’s almost more fun.
You know I’ve joked about how vixenating should be tax-deductible because it’s great hands-on research for my Geek Lit contemporary series, but it turns out, my fictionalized reality (VHM, the novel) was so close to actual reality (LaceyLand) that it’s almost stalker-like. One comment I repeatedly received from Maven Erica while writing VHM, the novel was that she was constantly able to feel the awkwardness of the situations the heroine (Lizzie; yes, intentional) got herself into. Now it turns out our If-X-then-Y plotting was so close to reality I’m going to look like a freak if my novel ever gets published (I’ve often referred to it as The Unpublishable Novel, and this was before the creepy stalker stuff came to light). So does that mean that we’re getting very good at plotting, or does it mean we’re not thinking larger-than-life enough to escape reality, or both?
In other words, unrealistic plots can be fun or they can create an instant wall-banger. A lot of it is how the author handles the plot itself, and the sparkliness of her writing and the lovability of her characters. But sometimes a plot is so realistic, it’s boring. Who wants to read about something that could’ve happened to you yesterday?
YOUR TURN: What sort of plot do you prefer? Realistic, completely fictional, or a little of both?